Implications of Atheistic and Theistic Visions of Reason

Authors

  • Ms. Manal Taha Ahmed Abdul Momen Al-Jarash PhD Candidate - Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Sana'a University, Yemen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56989/benkj.v5i12.1673

Keywords:

Reason, Atheism, Faith, Knowledge, Free Will, Moral Responsibility, Meaning

Abstract

This research aims to examine and compare the necessary implications of both atheistic and theistic visions regarding the role of reason. Through a systematic comparative and analytical approach, the study investigates four fundamental premises of each worldview. The first premise addresses the concept of knowledge, the second examines free will, the third explores moral responsibility, and the fourth analyzes meaning and value.

The research yields four principal conclusions: First, belief in God through the theistic vision is epistemologically grounded, while atheism struggles to maintain consistent epistemological foundations and sometimes acknowledges this inconsistency. Second, theistic faith affirms the existence of free will, whereas atheistic thought tends to view it as an illusion. Third, since theistic faith acknowledges free will, it logically follows that moral responsibility exists; conversely, atheistic denial of free will leads to the rejection of moral responsibility. Finally, regarding meaning and value, theistic faith ascribes inherent meaning and value to life and the universe, while atheistic thought negates all meaning and value, including the significance of reason itself.

 

References

المراجع

• Lewis, C.S,The Weight of Glory (New York: Zondervan, 2001). P.139

• .J.B.S. Haldane, Possible Worlds (NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2009). P.209

• Lennox, J., 2017, "Mind and Causality", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 184

• Alston, William P. (1964). Philosophy of Language. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA, First Edition.

• Cabanis, Pierre Jean Georges (1802). Rapports du physique et du moral de l'homme. Paris: Crapart, Caille et Ravier.

• Coyne, Jerry A. (2012). "You Don't Have Free Will". The Chronicle of Higher Education, Chronicle of Higher Education Inc., Washington D.C., USA, March 18.

• Craig, William Lane (2008). Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd ed. Wheaton: Crossway.

• Craig, William Lane (2010). On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision. Colorado Springs: David C. Cook.

• Darwin, Charles (1887). The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, edited by Francis Darwin. John Murray, London, Vol. 1.

• Dawkins, Richard (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

• Dawkins, Richard (1995). River Out of Eden. New York: Basic Books.

• Dennett, Daniel C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

• Frankl, Viktor E. (1988). The Will to Meaning: Foundations and Applications of Logotherapy. New American Library, New York.

• Frankl, Viktor E. (2006). Man's Search for Meaning. Beacon Press, Boston.

• Gazzaniga, Michael S. (2011). Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain. Ecco, New York, 1st edition.

• Harris, Sam (2012). Free Will. Free Press, New York.

• Hasker, William (1999). The Emergent Self. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, USA.

• Hick, John (1990). Philosophy of Religion. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA, Fourth Edition.

• Kane, Robert (1996). The Significance of Free Will. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, First Edition.

• Kripke, Saul A. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA, First Edition.

• Lewis, C.S. (2001). Miracles: A Preliminary Study. HarperCollins, New York [1947].

• Lewis, C.S. (2001). The Problem of Pain. HarperCollins, New York, USA, First Published 1940.

• Libet, Benjamin (1999). "Do We Have Free Will?". Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 6, No. 8-9, Imprint Academic.

• Nagel, Thomas (2012). Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. Oxford University Press, New York.

• Plantinga, Alvin (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, First Edition.

• Plantinga, Alvin (2011). Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford University Press, New York.

• Ruse, Michael (1989). "Evolutionary Theory and Christian Ethics". In The Darwinian Paradigm. London: Routledge.

• Ruse, Michael & Wilson, E.O. (1986). "Moral Philosophy as Applied Science". Philosophy, Vol. 61, No. 236, Cambridge University Press.

• Ryff, Carol D. (1989). "Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 6, American Psychological Association.

• Swinburne, Richard (1997). The Evolution of the Soul, Revised Edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

• Swinburne, Richard (2013). Mind, Brain, and Free Will. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, First Edition.

• Schultz, W., 2016, "Dopamine Reward Prediction Error Coding", Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 18, No. 1, AICH Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 23.

• Greene, J. D., 2013, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them, Penguin Books, New York, USA, 1st edition, p. 189.

• Nagel, Thomas, The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1986, First Edition, p. 125.

• Schultz, W., 2016, "Dopamine Reward Prediction Error Coding", Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 18, No. 1, AICH Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 23.

• Greene, J. D., 2013, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them, Penguin Books, New York, USA, 1st edition, p. 189.

• Nagel, Thomas, The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1986, First Edition, p. 125.

• Searle, John R. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, p. 88.

• Roger Trigg, Beyond Matter: why science needs metaphysics, Templeton press,2015,p.148.

• E.P. Wigner, The Unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the Natural Sciences, Communication in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol.XIII, 1960, p.2.

• Jhon Polkinghorne, Reson and Reality The Relationship between Science and Theology, London, SPCK Classics, 1991, p.76.

-العقل الديكارتي أساس المعرفة: دراسة تحليلية (2024). مجلة ابن خلدون للدراسات. benkjournal.com

-قراءة وصفية لنظرية المعرفة عند لايبنتز (2024). مجلة ابن خلدون للدراسات.

benkjournal.com

-العجيب المدهش والحدث المقدس في القصص القرآني (2024). مجلة ابن خلدون للدراسات.

benkjournal.com

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Al-Jarash, M. (2025). Implications of Atheistic and Theistic Visions of Reason. Ibn Khaldoun Journal for Studies and Researches, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.56989/benkj.v5i12.1673

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.