العمل الاجتماعي والطابع الإشكالي الإبستيمي المعقد: بين مطلب الاستقلالية وتعددية الحقول المعرفية
معرّف الغرض الرقمي:
https://doi.org/10.56989/benkj.v6i1.1695الكلمات المفتاحية:
إبستيمية العمل الاجتماعي،، الهوية العلمية،، الشرعية المعرفية،، التعدد المرجعيالملخص
تسعى هذه الدراسة إلى تفكيك الأسس الإبستمولوجية التي أسهمت في بلورة موقع العمل الاجتماعي ضمن النسق العام للعلوم الاجتماعية، والكشف عن مناشئ الإشكال الذي يحيط بهويته النظرية، بين اعتباره حقلًا معرفيًا أكاديميًا مستقلًا، وبين كونه مجالًا مهنيًا تدخليًا ذا طابع تطبيقي. وقد اعتمدت الدراسة مقاربة تحليلية نقدية، قامت على المقارنة بين أنماط إنتاج المعرفة المعاصرة ومسارات تشكّل الحقول العلمية. وتوصلت نتائج الدراسة إلى أن أزمة الهوية المعرفية للعمل الاجتماعي تعود، في جوهرها، إلى غياب الحسم الإبستمولوجي في تحديد مرجعيته العلمية وحدود تمايزه عن السوسيولوجيا. كما أظهرت النتائج أن اعتماد مقاربات بحثية منفتحة، قائمة على التداخلات المعرفية وتجسير البراديغمات النظرية، من شأنه أن يتيح إمكان بناء استقلال معرفي تدريجي لهذا الحقل، دون الانفصال عن مرتكزاته النظرية المؤسسة. وتخلص الدراسة إلى الدعوة لضرورة بلورة إطار إبستمولوجي مستقل للعمل الاجتماعي، يحقق توازنًا واعيًا بين الصرامة النظرية ومتطلبات الممارسة المهنية، بما يعزز حضوره كحقل معرفي تدخلي قادر على مواكبة التحولات المجتمعية، وإسناد البعد العملي للعلوم الاجتماعية.
This study seeks to deconstruct the epistemological foundations that have contributed to shaping the position of social work within the broader framework of the social sciences, and to uncover the sources of the problematic nature of its theoretical identity, oscillating between its consideration as an autonomous academic field of knowledge and its characterization as a professional, intervention-oriented practice. The study adopts a critical analytical approach, based on a comparative examination of contemporary modes of knowledge production and the trajectories through which scientific fields are constituted. The findings indicate that the crisis of the cognitive identity of social work fundamentally stems from the absence of epistemological decisiveness in defining its scientific reference framework and the boundaries that distinguish it from sociology. The results further demonstrate that adopting open and flexible research approaches grounded in interdisciplinary intersections and the bridging of theoretical paradigms can enable the gradual construction of cognitive autonomy for this field, without severing ties with its foundational theoretical underpinnings. The study ultimately calls for the formulation of an independent epistemological framework for social work—one that consciously balances theoretical rigor with the demands of professional practice—thereby strengthening its standing as an intervention-oriented field of knowledge capable of keeping pace with societal transformations and reinforcing the practical dimension of the social sciences.
المراجع
ــ لكفاوين، م. (2018). العمل الاجتماعي كنموذج من نماذج تنظيم المجتمع في الأردن: دراسة تحليلية. مجلة البحوث والدراسات الاجتماعية، جامعة القدس المفتوحة https://www.qou.edu/ar/conferences/socialWork/socialWork.pdf
ــ تريمش، م. (2024). إعادة الإنتاج في سبيل نظرية عامة لنسق التعليم (ترجمة بيير بورديو وجان كلود باسرون). دار الفكر العربي. https://istighrab.iicss.iq/files/investigations/62d0pxp0e.pdf
ــ فوكو، ميشيل. (1994). المعرفة والسلطة: مدخل إلى قراءة فوكو (ترجمة عبد العزيز العيادي). المؤسسة الجامعية للدراسات والنشر. file:///C:/Users/PC/Downloads/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85 _25705_Foulabook.com_.pdf
ــ بـــاللـــغــة الأجــنــبــية :
- Hothersall, S. J. (2016). Epistemology and social work: Integrating theory, research and practice through philosophical pragmatism .PDF https://research.edgehill.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/20188634/Hothersall%202016%20Epistemology%20and%20Social%20Work%20Uncorrected%20Proof.PDF
- Denvall, V., & Skillmark, M. (2020). Bridging turbulent waters: Closing the gap between research and practice in social work. Social Work Research Quarterly, 28(1), 15-33.PDF https://watermark.silverchair.com/bcaa055.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAA00wggNJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggM6MIIDNgIBADCCAy8GCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBgl
- Pascual, A., et al. (2024). Affirming the scientific identity of social work: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Social Work Research, 35(2), 101-120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11322067/
-McLaughlin, H., et al. (2024). Being, knowing and doing: aligning ontology, epistemology, and axiology to develop an account of social work as practice. Social Work Education. DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2024.2330598
- Papadopoulos, I., & Egan, R. (2023). Social work graduates' professional socialisation and identity. International Social Work. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00208728251319494
- Fook, J. (2022). Toward a definition of professional identity for social work. British Journal of Social Work. : https://academic.oup.com/bjsw/article/55/2/877/7950794
- Papadopoulos, I., & Egan, J. (2025). Toward a definition of professional identity for social work. British Journal of Social Work. Advance online publication. https://academic.oup.com/bjsw/article/55/2/877/7950794
- Webb, S. A. (2017). Professional identity and social work. In The Routledge Companion to the Professions and Professionalism (pp. 355-370). Routledge. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/36755412/Professional_Identity_chapter_SW-libre.pdf?
- Salifu, J. (2023). Becoming a social worker: Personal and professional identity formation among social welfare officers in Ghana. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 18(2), 180-206. https://journals.uis.no/index.php/JCSW/article/view/675/412
- Gilbert, M., et al. (2025). Mechanisms that impact the experience and sustainability of the professional identity of social workers. European Journal of Social Work. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13691457.2025.2505230
- Björkman, M., & Svensson, B. (2022). Legitimizing user knowledge in mental health services: Epistemic (in)justice and barriers to knowledge integration. Health & Social Care in the Community. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454952/
- Byskov, M. F. (2021). What makes epistemic injustice an “injustice”?. Journal of Social Philosophy, 52(1), 114-131. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/137014/1/WRAP-what-makes-epistemic-injustice-%E2%80%9Cinjustice%E2%80%9D-Byskov-2020.pdf
- Beena, R., & Archana, R. (2010). Community organization and social action. https://faclschs.univ-annaba.dz/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%B6%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%84-.pdf
- International Federation of Social Workers and International Association of Schools of Social Work (IFSWK). (2014). Global Definition of Social Work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/
- Brown, K., et al. (2015). Social work and social justice: A critical approach to practice. https://journals.qou.edu/index.php/jrresstudy/article/view/2530/2661
- Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017, January). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. In Forum qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: qualitative social research (Vol. 18, No. 1). file:///C:/Users/PC/Downloads/FQS_18_1_Harrison_Case-Study-Research_-Foundations-and-Methodological-Orientations.pdf
- Campbell, C., & Baikie, G. (2012). Beginning at the beginning: An exploration of critical social work. Critical social work, 13(1). file:///C:/Users/PC/Downloads/olsenc,+BeginningAtTheBeginning%20(4).pdf
- Cabassa, L. J. (2016). Implementation Science: Why it matters for the future of social work. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5312777/pdf/nihms809963.pdf
- Pendell, K., & Kimball, E. (2021). Dissemination of applied research to the field: Attitudes and practices of faculty authors in social work. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 34(1), Article 546. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.546
- Fortune, A. E., Lee, M. Y., & Cavazos, A. (2010). Implementation science and social work: A review. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(5), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509358424
- Epstein, I. (2015). Social work practice and implementation science: A new paradigm. Social Work, 60(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swv020
- Gair, S., Zuchowski, I., Beddoe, L., & Tangata, T. K. T. (2021). Open access publishing: A key enabler to research impact, informed practice and social justice. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 22(2), 25-38. https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/64538/10/64815_Gair_et_al_2021.pdf
- Teater, B. (2017). Social work research and its relevance to practice:“The gap between research and practice continues to be wide”. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(5), 547-565. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/54158141/Social_Work_Research_Final-libre.pdf?1502910634=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DSocial_work_research_and_its_relevance_t.pdf
- Shaw, I. F. (2021). Social work and sociology/sociology and social work: Peering back and forth. Qualitative Social Work, 20(5), 1184-1203. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1473325020973300
- Watson, D., & West, J. (2006). Social work process and practice: Approaches, knowledge and skills. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://bocahbancar.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ebooksclub-org_socia-lwork-process-and-practice_approaches_knowledge-and-skill.pdf
- Rullac, S. (2011). De la scientificité du travail social. Quelles recherches pour quels savoirs?. Pensée plurielle, 26(1), 111-128. file:///C:/Users/PC/Downloads/de-la-scientificite-du-travail-social-quelles-recherches-pour-quels-savoirs.pdf
- Bell, K. (2020). A philosophy of social work beyond the anthropocene. In Post-anthropocentric social work (pp. 58-67). Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vivienne-Bozalek/publication/347570863_Hauntology_history_and_heritage/links/66c08a6d2ff54d6c9ed7a44e/Hauntology-history-and-heritage.pdf#page=84
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2025 مجلة ابن خلدون للدراسات والأبحاث
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
