The Impact of The Ethical Leadership and Knowledge sharing on the Employees Creativity: An Investigation of Saudi Companies
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study addresses contemporary issues pertinent to both business research and practice, focusing on leadership roles, knowledge sharing, and their influence on employee creativity a topic with limited local research attention. Specifically, it examines the ethical dimension of leadership and the role of knowledge sharing in enhancing employee creativity within organizations. The study's primary purpose is to scrutinize the impact of ethical leadership, characterized by integrity and fairness, on employee creativity, as well as the effects of supportive knowledge sharing by leaders. Key inquiries include the examination of leadership integrity and fairness on employee creativity, and the influence of knowledge sharing support on creativity. Employing a theoretical model derived from literature, the research methodology employs surveys to test hypotheses and gather data from a sample of 250 employees across diverse industries. One of the study’s key findings is that ethical leadership positively affects employee creativity. Employees engage in successful knowledge sharing, contributing to creativity both within their job roles and across organizational knowledge domains. Practically, the study underscores the importance of ethical leadership and knowledge exchange in fostering employee creativity within Saudi enterprises, particularly emphasizing the educational level. Its findings fill a crucial gap in this area, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners. In terms of originality and value, this study represents a recent and quantitative exploration of a topic that has been relatively overlooked. By investigating the impacts of leader integrity, fairness, and knowledge sharing on employee creativity, it provides meaningful contributions to unexplored areas of employee output. However, the study acknowledges certain limitations. It was conducted solely in Saudi Arabia and across various sectors. Future research could explore different countries or specific sectors to enable comparative analyses. Additionally, qualitative or mixed-method approaches could provide deeper insights into employee creativity. Moreover, future studies could delve into how organizations define and measure creativity, further enriching our understanding of this complex phenomenon.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Anser, M., & & al. (2020). The impacts of COVID-19 measures on global environment and fertility rate: double coincidence. Air Qual Atmos Health, 13, 1083-1092.
Asadullah, A., & & al. (2018). Digital Platforms: A Review and Future Directions. Japan.
Belleflamme, P., & & al. (2015). The Economics of Crowdfunding Platforms. Discussion Paper, 1-61. Belgium: Operations Research and Econometric.
Belleflamme, P., & & al. (2015). The Economics of Crowdfunding Platforms. Discussion Paper, 1-61. Belgium: Operations Research and Econometrics .
Brown M. E, & & al. (n.d.). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. . Organizational behavior and human decision processes., 7(92), 117-134.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134.
Elqassaby, H. (2018). The effect of ethical leadership on employee creativity.. International Journal of Economics and Management Science, 7(5), 1-13.
Galbraith, J. (2002). Organizing to Deliver. Organisation Dynamics, 31(2), 194- 207.
Heres, L., & Lasthuizen, K. (2012). What's the Difference? Ethical Leadership in Public, Hybrid and Private Sector Organizations. Journal of Change Management, 12(4), 441-466.
Langdon , M., & & al. (2014). Agile Innovation: The Revolutionary Approach to Accelerate Success, Inspire Engagement, and Ignite Creativity. Canada: Wiley & Sons.
Lee, E.-S., & & al. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049–1080.
Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of management journal, 55(1), 151-171.
MO , A., & Uchenna, U. (2012). Work Ethics and Productivity in Local Government System in Nigeria, Problems and Prospects. African Research Review.
Salas-Vallina, A., & & al. (2020). The challenge of increasing employees' well‐being and performance: How human resource management practices and engaging leadership work together toward reaching this goa. Human Resource Management.
Sarooghi, H., & & al. (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, ans environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 714-731.
Treviño, L.K., den Nieuwenboer, N.A. and Kish-Gephart, J.J. (2014), “(Un)Ethical behavior in organizations”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 635-660.
Valério,, D., & Sá da Costa, J. (2011). Variable-order fractional derivatives and their numerical approximations. Signal Processing, 470-483.
Walumbwa, F., & & al. (2017). Does ethical leadership enhance group learning behavior? Examining the mediating influence of group ethical conduct, justice climate, and peer justice. Journal of Business Research, 14-23
Wiltermuth , S., & Flynn, F. (2013). Power, moral clarity, and punishment in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1002 - 1023.
WolfeMorrisson, E., & Milliken, F. (2000). Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World. The Academy Of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
Xenikou, A. (2022). Leadership and Organizational Culture. Edward Elgar Publishing. Newton, & R. Knight (Eds.).