Pedagogical Innovation in Universities’ Teaching

Main Article Content

Mrs. Huda Salih Manshad

Abstract

 Pedagogical innovation is critical in the twenty-first century, and each university, classroom or educational institution must take this point as an ultimate goal of their educational system. Professors are responsible for preparing students to tackle new challenges, which is why innovative teaching methods have become important for keeping spirit up.


 This paper sheds light on pedagogical innovation at universities and give a review of its many forms, features, methodologies, and significance in the twenty-first century. It has been found that the types of pedagogical innovation are classified socially and technically. Moreover, the paper asserts that the innovative teaching methods do not consider all students at the same comprehension level according to their different abilities and skills.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Manshad, H. S. (2022). Pedagogical Innovation in Universities’ Teaching. Ibn Khaldoun Journal for Studies and Researches, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.56989/benkj.v2i6.366
Section
Articles

References

Béchard, J-P. (2000). Apprendre à enseigner au supérieur: l’exemple des innovateurs pédagogiques. Cahier de recherche OIPG2000-001, Septembre.

Béchard, J-P. (2001), L’enseignement supérieur et les innovations pédagogiques: une recension des écrits, Revue des Sciences de l’Éducation, XXVII (2), 257-281.

Béchard, J-P. et Pelletier, P. (2001). Développement des innovations pédagogiques en milieu universitaire: cas d’apprentissage organisationnel. Dans Nouveaux espaces de développement professionnel et organisationnel, 131-149. Sherbrooke: É Hannan, A and Silver, H. (2000). Innovating in Higher Education: teaching, learning, and institutional culture. Buckgham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

Becher, T. and Kogan, M. (1980). Process and Structure in Higher Education. London: Heinemann.

Bédard, D. & Béchard, J-P. (2009). Innover dans l’enseignement supérieur. Paris: PUF.

Boden, K. (2019) Pedagogical Innovation among University Faculty. Creative Education, 10, 848-861. https: //2u.pw/Oujug

Bok, D. (2008). Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https: //doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4jc0

Breslow, L. (2010). Wrestling with Pedagogical Change: The TEAL Initiative at MIT. Change, 42, 23-29. https: //2u.pw/v3R7l

Charlier, B. & Peraya, D. (2003). Nouveaux dispositifs de formation pour l'enseignement supérieur, allier technologie et innovation. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Cros, F. & Adamczewski, G. (1996). L'innovation en éducation et en formation. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Cros, F. (2001). L’innovation scolaire (Enseignants et Chercheurs – Synthèse et mise en débat). Paris: INRP.

Cros, F. (2002-2). L’innovation en éducation aurait-elle un avenir? In certainties and paradoxes of innovation. Paris: INRP, 221-229.

Cros, F. (2007). L’agir innovationnel: entre créativité et formation. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Furst-Bowe, J. A., & Bauer, R. A. (2007). Application of the Baldrige Model for Innovation in Higher Education. New Directions for Higher Education, 137, 5-14. https: //doi.org/10.1002/he.242

Huberman, A. M. (1973). Comment s'opèrent les changements en éducation: contribution à l'étude de l'innovation, Série: Expériences et innovations en éducation, 2 - Nations Unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture, Paris: Unesco. dition du CRP.

Istance, David. (2019, January 23 ). Approaches to pedagogical innovation and why they matter. Education Plus Development. https: //2u.pw/qzMbj

Kezar, A. J. (2009). Change in Higher Education: Not Enough, or Too Much. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41, 18-23. https: //2u.pw/HYHjc

Kontoghiorghes, C., Awbrey, S. M., & Feurig, P. L. (2005). Examining the Relationship between Learning Organization Characteristics and Change Adaptation, Innovation, and Organizational Performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 185-211. https: //2u.pw/XwJPm

Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Prediger, S. (2004). Intercultural Perspectives on Mathematics Learning – Developing a Theoretical Framework. International Journal of Science AMD Mathematics Education, 2 (3), 377-406.

Richards, E. M. (2004). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

St-Pierre, L. (2008). Rôles et actes pédagogiques dans un contexte innovant: comment les enseignantes et les enseignants se centrent-ils sur l’apprentissage ? Pédagogie Collégiale, 22 (1), Automne.

Walder, Anne .(2014). The Concept of Pedagogical Innovation in Higher Education. Education Journal. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2014, pp. 195-202. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20140303.22

Walder, Anne. (2014). Pedagogical Innovation: Between Social Reality and Technology. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences. 18. 2046-9578.

Walder, Anne. (2015). A Theoretical Model for Pedagogical Innovation: A Tripartite Construction of Pedagogical Innovation Focusing on Reasons for and Means of Innovating. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences. 12. 180-197.

White, S. C., & Glickman, T. S. (2007). Innovation in Higher Education: Implications for the Future. New Directions for Higher Education, 137, 97-105. https: //2u.pw/TQ5bI

Zemsky, R. (2009). Making Reform Work: The Case for Transforming American Higher Education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Zhang, J. (2010). Technology-Supported Learning Innovation in Cultural Contexts. Educational Technology Research and Developme9nt, 58, 229-243. https: //2u.pw/funfo

Mehta, Sujata . “Modern Teaching Methods – It’s Time For The Change. Eduvoice.” https: //2u.pw/NnXhB (accessed on February 18, 2022).