Authentication of administrative contracts: an applied rooting study according to the provisions of the Courts of the Board of Grievances in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

The study aimed to highlight the issue of the rooting of administrative contracts: an applied rooting study according to the provisions of the Courts of the Board of Grievances in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where the researcher followed the descriptive and analytical scientific method and enabled the research problem to arrive at an answer to the main research questions How can the rooting of administrative contracts according to the provisions of the Courts of the Board of Grievances in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia? And the sub-questions branched from it as it is the most appropriate for the topic of the research, by obtaining the material necessary to complete this research from the available sources and references and conducting analyzes for each legal text related to the study. Addressing the pillars of the administrative contract, clarifying the meaning of the term administrative contract. And from the results of the research: The administrative contract, once concluded, creates equal obligations in the debts of its parties. There is no difference in that between the management body that represents the public interest and the contractor with it, whether it is an individual or a private or public company. Also, the Board of Grievances in the Kingdom is competent to hear disputes related to these contracts in the capacity of an administrative judiciary, as long as the administration is a party to this contract.