Effectiveness of an Action Research Intervention Based on Formative Assessment Strategies in Improving Cognitive Learning Outcomes among Female Students in the Third Year of Intermediate School
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Abstract
This study examined changes in cognitive learning outcomes associated with an action research intervention based on formative assessment strategies among female students in the third year of intermediate school learning English. A one-group pretest–posttest design was used with 38 students; behavioral responses were tracked for a purposively selected subgroup of five students who showed low levels of response. Data were collected using a 30-item achievement test covering vocabulary, grammar, and reading comprehension, and a 10-indicator observation checklist. The two-week intervention incorporated short quizzes, exit tickets, corrective feedback, self-assessment, and peer assessment. Mean achievement scores increased from 14.32 at pretest to 25.89 at posttest, with a mean difference of 11.58 points (t = 7.822, p < .001; Cohen’s dz = 1.27). The mean behavioral response rate among the five tracked students increased from 23.40% at the beginning of the intervention to 83.70% at its conclusion. Friedman’s test indicated statistically significant differences across the three observations (p = .007), whereas exact pairwise comparisons using the Wilcoxon test did not reach statistical significance. The findings indicate improvement concurrent with the intervention. However, they should be interpreted in light of the one-group design, the small behavioral subsample, and the short implementation period; this design does not establish that the intervention alone caused the observed improvement.
References
أولًا: المراجع العربية
• آل إبراهيم، شيبان إبراهيم، والحسن، رياض عبد الرحمن. (2024). أثر استراتيجية التقويم التكويني الإلكتروني في تدريس مادة الحاسب في تنمية التحصيل الدراسي لدى طلبة الصف الثاني الثانوي. المجلة الدولية للدراسات التربوية والنفسية، 13(4)، 675–693.
• الخثعمي، فوزية خفير عبد الله. (2022). تصور مقترح لتضمين استراتيجيات التقويم البديل في مقرر اللغة الإنجليزية للصف الأول المتوسط. دراسات عربية في التربية وعلم النفس، (142)، 231–264. https://doi.org/10.21608/saep.2022.237064
• السويلم، محمد حمد، والعثيم، أروى علي. (2024). تصميم فيديو تفاعلي قائم على نمطي التغذية الراجعة (التصحيحية–التعزيزية) وأثره في تنمية التحصيل المعرفي لقواعد اللغة الإنجليزية لدى طالبات المرحلة المتوسطة. المجلة العربية للنشر العلمي، (68)، 406–433.
• الغنيم، حمد بن صالح بن عبد العزيز. (2025). اختلاف أسلوب تقديم التغذية الراجعة التصحيحية في بيئة تعلم الفصل المعكوس وأثرها على تنمية الانخراط في تعلم اللغة الإنجليزية لدى طلبة المرحلة الثانوية بالمملكة العربية السعودية. مجلة العلوم التربوية والدراسات الإنسانية، (43)، 285–318. https://doi.org/10.55074/hesj.vi43.1239
• علي، بسمة فيصل. (2024). فاعلية استراتيجيتين للتغذية الراجعة في تدريس المفردات لدى طلاب اللغة الإنجليزية لغة أجنبية. مجلة بحوث اللغات، 8(10)، 184–202. https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.8.10.10
• عمر، عبد المجيد الطيب، وأمين، عبد الرحمن عبد الملك. (2021). أثر التقويم التكويني على أداء الطلاب في اللغة الإنجليزية للأغراض الخاصة: دراسة حالة لطلاب السنة التحضيرية بجامعة أم القرى بمكة. مجلة جامعة أم القرى لعلوم اللغات وآدابها، (27)، 307–376. https://doi.org/10.54940/ll96609190
• هيئة تقويم التعليم والتدريب. (2024). دليل تطبيق الاختبارات الوطنية «نافس» 2024.
• هيئة تقويم التعليم والتدريب. (2025). دليل ولي الأمر للاختبارات الوطنية «نافس» 2025.
ثانيًا: المراجع الأجنبية
• Alharthi, S. M. (2025). Examining EFL learners’ quantity and quality of uptake of teacher corrective feedback on writing across three different editing settings. Assessing Writing, 63, Article 100911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100911
• Alsahil, A., Abdel Latif, M. M. M., & Alsuhaibani, Z. (2026). Exploring EFL learner engagement with different teacher feedback modes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39(1–2), 336–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2374785
• Alshahrani, A., & Storch, N. (2025). Investigating the effectiveness of scaffolded feedback on EFL Saudi students’ writing accuracy: A longitudinal classroom-based study. Assessing Writing, 63, Article 100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100910
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
• Benson, C. (2024). Guidance for the classroom-based assessment of multilingual learners: Assessing languages, literacies and learning across the curriculum. UNESCO & UNICEF Regional Office for East Asia and the Pacific.
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
• Li, C., Fryer, L. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2025). Utilising gamified formative assessment to support English language learning in schools: A scoping review. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 19(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2352789
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Unlocking high-quality teaching. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f5b82176-en
• Saeed, M. A., & Alharbi, M. A. (2025). Show and talk or show and let’s talk? Enhancing formative assessment and students’ uptake through asynchronous and synchronous screencast technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(3), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2359469
• Schwantner, U., & Maghnouj, S. (Eds.). (2023). Supporting schools’ and teachers’ use of assessment to inform all students of learning. UNESCO & Australian Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-731-1
• Snilstveit, B., Stevenson, J., Menon, R., Phillips, D., Gallagher, E., Geleen, M., Jobse, H., Schmidt, T., & Jimenez, E. (2016). The impact of education programmes on learning and school participation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review summary report. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
• Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• World Bank. (2024). Saudi Arabia learning poverty brief (April 2024, Version 2).
• Yao, Y., Amos, M., Snider, K., & Brown, T. (2024). The impact of formative assessment on K–12 learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 29(7–8), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2024.2363831
• Zeng, X., & Ravindran, L. (2024). The effects of peer feedback provision and reception on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ writing development. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, Article 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101422
• Zhang, H., Ge, S., & Mohd Saad, M. R. B. M. (2024). Formative assessment in K–12 English as a foreign language education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(10), Article e31367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31367
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibn Khaldoun Journal for Studies and Researches

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






















