Structural Transformations of the Sudanese State under International and Regional Competition: A Critical Political Economy Approach from the Frankfurt School Perspective
Keywords:
اقتصاد سياسي , التنافس الدولي , التنافس الاقليمي , مدرسة فرانكفورتSustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Abstract
This study critically analyzes the structural transformations of the Sudanese state amid escalating international and regional competition, positioning Sudan as one of the geopolitically significant arenas in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea region, with the consequent overlap of political, economic, and security interests of international and regional powers. The study is based on the fundamental premise that this competition has not been limited to traditional forms of intervention but has extended to more complex mechanisms for reproducing hegemony and dependency—a dynamic that can be deconstructed and analyzed through the tools of the Frankfurt School of critical theory, which focuses on the dialectical relationship between power, economy, and culture. The study adopts a theoretical approach combining the Frankfurt School, dependency theory, and the international political economy framework, allowing for a deeper understanding of patterns of indirect control and their impact on the structure and core functions of the state. The research employs descriptive-analytical and critical methods to analyze official documents, international reports, political discourses, as well as a review of relevant Arabic and foreign literature. The findings show that international and regional competition has directly contributed to weakening the autonomy of Sudanese political decision-making, reshaping the national economy to serve external interests at the expense of sustainable development requirements, and deepening structural crises related to governance and political stability. The study also concludes that the absence of a cohesive national project and weak institutions have facilitated the penetration of the state by external actors. The study recommends adopting national strategies based on enhancing economic sovereignty, diversifying international partnerships, and building institutions capable of managing interaction with the international system more independently and effectively.
References
اولاً: المراجع العربية:
1. ابراهيم، عبد الله على، (2008). الهوس الثنائي: تفكيك القضاء والاستعمار وتجديد الفكر الاسلامي في السودان، ليدن دار بريل.
2. أمين، س. (2014). الرأسمالية والعولمة في العالم العربي والإفريقي. القاهرة: المركز العربي للأبحاث ودراسة السياسات.
3. أمين، سمير (2018). التراكم على الصعيد العالمي، بيروت. دار ابن خلدون.
4. بركات حليم، (2006). المجتمع العربي المعاصر. بيروت مركز دراسات الوحدى العربية.
5. الجابري، محمد عابد، (1999). نقد العقل العربي. بيروت مركز دراسات الوحدة العربية.
6. عبدالعزيز، م. (2020). السودان بين المصالح الدولية والسيادة الوطنية: دراسة تحليلية. الخرطوم: دار الفكر المعاصر.
ثانياً: المراجع الأجنبية المترجمة:
1. هابرماس، يوغن (1984). نظرية الفعل التواصلي، بوسطن: دار بيكون.
2. ماركوزة، هربرت (1964). الإنسان ذو البعد الواحد: دراسات في ايدولوجيا المجتمع الصناعي المتقدم، بوسطن: دار بيكون
3. الرشتاين، ايمانويل (2004). تحليل النظم العالمية: مدخل. دورهام: مطبعة جامعة ديوك
ثالثاً: المراجع الأجنبية:
1. Adorno, T. W. (1991). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture. Routledge.
2. Amin, S. (2014). Capitalism in the age of globalization: The unequal development of the global south. Monthly Review Press.
3. Clapham, C. (2017). Africa and the international system: The politics of state survival. Cambridge University Press.
4. Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
5. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.
6. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press.
7. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
8. Held, D. (2004). Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington Consensus. Polity Press.
9. Horkheimer, M. (1982). Critical theory: Selected essays. Continuum.
10. Large, D. (2019). China and Africa: A strategic partnership? Hurst & Company.
11. Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge University Press.
12. Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge University Press.
13. Verhoeven, H. (2018). Water, power and politics in the Nile basin. Cambridge University Press.
14. Woodward, P. (2018). US foreign policy and the Horn of Africa. Routledge.
15. Young, J. (2019). The political economy of Sudan: State, markets, and resources. Cambridge University Press.
16. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibn Khaldoun Journal for Studies and Researches

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






















